I tried to send this out earlier today, but it never showed up (trouble
on my end)
The reason I was suggesting an oracle specific option name was because I
really think that we need to use the Oracle specific syntax to return
the rowid value on inserts.
Georg Rehfeld wrote:
> Dear Vinay,
>
>
>> Have started looking at the code again,
>> Do we want to specifically say 'oracle-tuned-updates'. What if
>
> actually
>
>> proves useful for some other database - can't we just call it just
>> 'rowid-column' and use the presence or absence of the tag to use rowid
>
> based
>
>> updates?
>
>
> What about 'stable-rowid-column' and a good comment and documentation?
>
> regards
> Georg
> ___ ___
> | + | |__ Georg Rehfeld Woltmanstr. 12 20097 Hamburg
> |_|_\ |___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 (40) 23 53 27 10
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
