Yes, we can include the cvs commit msg in the code but I'm not in favor of
it. At best it reproduces the comments that should be in the code out of context.
In general it gives a higher level description of a change that was made across
several files that were bulk commited.
There are also known issues with use of the $Log$ keyword to include the comments
causing problems during merges.
> that it goes way beyond the original team (it is happening *right now*) I
> believe we should really enforce "the comments in the code". Yes I know
> that the logs are what are supposed to keep that but frankly I would rather
> see it all in one place, ie. at the top of the file to see who has done
> what, since it gets very confusing and you have to be online to get that
> information through cvs.
>
> I am open to that one, how do you guys feel? (do you feel strongly against
> it? I remember one of you feeling strongly) but frankly more than once I
> read code and I go, huh? where does that come from... that would be very
> useful.
>
> Is there a way to have cvs include the commits messages automatically?
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
