On 2001.11.30 21:36:31 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> Hi David
> 
> For me the directory structure doesn't matter but I need
> a way to create the JSR-77 components along the way
> which means I need:
> - DDs
> - name of the application, module and component
> - need to know which module belongs to which application
> - which component (EJB, Connector, Servlet etc.) belongs
>    to which module
> 
> Therefore these information must be handed through the
> deployement process.
> The JSR-77 components are created whenever the JBoss
> component it represents is created. Right now this happens
> in J2eeDeployer, ContainerFactory and Application.
> 
> Can you tell when your rewrite of the deployment is finished
> and made active in JBoss.

yes. I will keep what you need in mind - I think it will be easily
accessible.

You've probably already told me at least once, but I'm still not entirely
clear if you are developing something that (while implementing jsr77) is
jboss specific or if it is intended to run on any app server.

I'm wondering since I think it would be useful to have mbeans representing
deployment units, where the mbeans can participate in the mbean dependency
stuff.  So you could make one part of your app wait for another part to be
deployed.  I already did this with RARDeployment, so
ConnectionFactoryLoaders wouldn't get started until the connector they
needed was there.  Could the management beans you are working on be used
for that? To make it work, from my point of view, all you need is to call
ServiceController.registerAndStartService after your mbean is created.  The
"start" part doesn't have to be implemented or do anything.

Thanks
david jencks
 
> 
> Thanx - Andy
> 
> > tmp/deploy/J2EEDeployer/deploy.87/survey.ear
> > tmp/deploy/J2EEDeployer/deploy.88/application.xml
> > tmp/deploy/J2EEDeployer/deploy.89/firstjar.jar
> > tmp/deploy/J2EEDeployer/deploy.90/secondjar.jar
> > tmp/deploy/J2EEDeployer/deploy.91/firstwar.war (I think)
> > 
> > With UniversalDeployer the J2EEDeployer level would go away.
> > 
> > Would this work for you?  Would you rather have
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to