On 2001.11.30 22:31:29 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote: > > yes. I will keep what you need in mind - I think it will be easily > > accessible. > > Good. > > > You've probably already told me at least once, but I'm still not > entirely > > clear if you are developing something that (while implementing jsr77) > is > > jboss specific or if it is intended to run on any app server. > > The JSR-77 implementation is JBoss specific because it has to map the > JBoss internal data structure to the JSR-77 data structure. As already > said JSR-77 does not offer code by a model how the presented data > looks like.
good news for me;-) I can keep suggesting uses for it. > > > I'm wondering since I think it would be useful to have mbeans > representing > > deployment units, where the mbeans can participate in the mbean > dependency > > stuff. So you could make one part of your app wait for another part to > be > > deployed. I already did this with RARDeployment, so > > ConnectionFactoryLoaders wouldn't get started until the connector they > > needed was there. Could the management beans you are working on be > used > > for that? To make it work, from my point of view, all you need is to > call > > ServiceController.registerAndStartService after your mbean is created. > The > > "start" part doesn't have to be implemented or do anything. > > I am not quite sure and must have a look at it. The problem I see is that > I > don't > know exactly what I am waiting for (we have n-application, up to > 3n-modules > and m*3n components). hmmm, my idea may be half baked, I was thinking of using the jsr mbeans as something for non-jsr mbeans to wait for rather than vice-versa. Well, here's an idea, I've been wondering how to specify that an application component should be deployed into a particular scope or perhaps virtual host. Perhaps as part of jboss-specific deployment descriptors it would be possible to specify as part of the jsr-mbean config representing the application piece what scope it belongs to and if it is depending on other mbeans? If this was not supplied the default would be its own scope and no dependencies. david jencks > > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
