Yes, and these examples should ship with the JBoss distribution.  They
should also be run with the nightly build so that we know whether or not
they work.  I think these examples are crucial now that the bulk of
documentation will be for-pay.

Bill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Tilly, Jesse
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 4:23 PM
> To: 'Hicks, James'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App
>
>
> I think you'd be trying to bite off too much too fast.  An
> application that
> encompassed all of the extensive features of JBoss and J2EE would be very
> large and very complex.  That's why I don't like the PetStore application.
> Many people look to it for development patterns with J2EE that don't fit
> their application very well.  Others get frustrated because there's no
> CMP/BMP-hybrid EJB that joins 4 tables used by a stateful session EJB
> that's, in turn, called by a stateless session EJB to control
> transactional
> context.  (Whew!)
>
> Anyway, you see what I mean, you'll be designing a bad application or poor
> examples.  Design each example for its purpose and the rest will take care
> of itself.  We'd get the work done quicker and with better
> quality.  If, as
> it's coming along, we see parts that can make up a larger application, we
> can go from there.
>
> I think this is a great idea, though, James.  I've long believed that the
> J2EE specification needed examples beyond the scope of a PetStore.
>
> Jesse
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hicks, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:36 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App
> >
> >
> > From reading all the emails, I think the majority of people
> > would benefit
> > from several small applications that each deal with a
> > specific feature of
> > JBoss 3.0.
> >
> > Do yall ( im texan ) think it is feasible to design these
> > small independant
> > applications so that in the end, a wrapper application could
> > be developed to
> > show developers how to tie all these features together?
> >
> > I guess we need to define a few features that are really the topic of
> > discussion on the user list and start developing.  Any suggestions?
> >
> > James Hicks
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hicks, James
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:42 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App
> >
> >
> > I've been doing a few hours of thinking and came to a
> > conclusion for a demo
> > app.
> >
> > Would anyone like to assist me in creating an E-Bay style bidding
> > application?
> >
> > James Hicks
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>



_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to