marc fleury wrote: > >> 2. Is the boot-server configuration only used for booting over the network >> - can we try this out just now, and how do you decide what configuration >> it obtains/supplies?? > That I really don't know what it is doing there, see my previous > mail on jetty here http://www.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66=4975 This draws a blank when I try to browse it...
> It's gone unless I hear from Jules in the next 30 seconds. OK. I won't lose any sleep over it then :). Is the net booting stuff still active? > > I HAD BUILD THAT SUPPORT IN THE FIRST VERSION ON RH I will make sure > it is still there (I think it is actually). Then the *preferred* > way is to just drop the xml snippet or add it to the base > jboss-service.xml if you know it is going to be part of the server > always. The only advantage of doing the snippet would be monitoring > and reconfiguring the service based on this. Could be useful. > Can't you monitor and reconfigure the services which are always deployed too? Do you mean that the snippet files would be rewritten (a la jboss-auto.jcml) to reflect changes in the configuration? > >> I'll have a go at redoing the simple mbean lab we did in London to >> see if I can clear things up, but any information on the basic >> setup these days would be very useful. >> > > The London lab covers the creation of a standard mbean with the xml > file format, it was quite simple but required a server restart > everytime you changed the class or the configuration jcml. What we > are talking about here is the capacity to hot-deploy these guys. So > the next London lab will probably focus on the ability to change > that separate snippet and develop the class live, soooo easy for > development. > OK. So to clarify - what's the current situation if I update the snippet file - how do you determine which classes need reloaded? You mentioned that you *could* monitor lib/ext but presumably that doesn't happen currently. Where do I specify which classes my service needs and how are they reloaded? > forget the SAR *****packaging***** madness for now. The features are > really nice, but (french saying) we are "butt-fucking flies" :O > over silly packaging issues. > > Is this clear? > It's much clearer. Once I've tried it out I should get that warm glow for a while... I think the stuff about where my service classes should go in order to be dynamically reloaded should clinch it... As far as I can see all the current services all have classpaths which point to files which are exclusively in lib/ext. Butt-fucking flies is pretty clear and sounds like a useful French phrase to know - what is the original "enculer des mouches" or something like that?? I know the Chinese would say "taking trousers down to fart" which is equally appropriate and is a bit less vulgar :). Luke. -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523C http://www.mkeym.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
