|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:00 AM
|To: Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|
|
|Or equivalently, mirror the deploy1, deploy2, ... etc structure in
|the ear.
|
|Case 1:
|ear/
|------deploy1/sar
|------deploy1/war
|
|Case 2:
|ear/
|------deploy1/war
|------deploy2/sar

yes, and i actually now prefer the explicit SXX solution for naming, doing
away with rc.d structures.  We just order by number SIMPLE, ultra  SIMPLE

in the abscence of numbering we deploy after the numbers.

marcf

|
|Then you have the same ordering logic for the fixed directories and
|application deployment units.
|
|xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|Scott Stark
|Chief Technology Officer
|JBoss Group, LLC
|xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|----- Original Message -----
|From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: "Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net"
|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 7:47 AM
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|
|
|>
|> ----- Original Message -----
|> From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|> To: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David Jencks"
|> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|> Cc: "Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net"
|> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:42 AM
|> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|>
|>
|> > ok,
|> >
|> > so i will implement the following
|> >
|> > deploy directory remains there, you can drop anything in deploy.
|> >
|> > 3 rules:
|> >> > jar/
|> > ---sar
|> > ---war/
|> > ------jar2
|> > 1- There is an ordering in deploy xml>sar>war>ear>jar or whatever i had
|in
|> > there before.
|> >
|> > 2-if you deploy a bean with dependencies, whatever they may be, i.e.
|> > sar/ear/war/rar/jar containment is enough to order.  The inner stuff is
|> > deployed first
|> > so
|
|> >
|> > will result in the following order
|> > jar2>sar>war>jar
|> >
|> > this is great, this is today in cvs, unless a certain someone removed
|this
|> > as well.
|> >
|> > The problem is a painful russian doll structure.
|> This is using Ant as the deployment language. If the sar depends on the
|> war because it is adapting a legacy protocol to soap for example, you
|> would then need to repackage the above to:
|>
|> jar/
|> ---war/
|> ------sar
|> ------jar2
|>
|> I would rather see an ear as the standalone deployment package and
|> include a jboss-application.xml descriptor that allows for the
|specification
|> of deployment ordering in there.
|>
|>
|>
|> _______________________________________________
|> Jboss-development mailing list
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to