What? This is insane... we do not need to complicate the default configuration as an example...
Really... how do you come to these conclusions? Do you flip a coin, heads it stays, tails it goes? This is complexity... Mr. KISS is going for the complex solution... and why? --jason On Monday 03 June 2002 03:16 pm, marc fleury wrote: > that is fine as it will show the usage of unpacked directories to deploy > and it is a good option as well > > marcf > > |-----Original Message----- > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jules > |Gosnell > |Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:58 PM > |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jan Bartel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Where should the Jasper jar live ? > | > | > |OK, > | > |It looks like I have been bludgeoned into seperating Jetty config and > | impl. > | > |Just for the record, Jason, I still don't think you have taken in my > |suggestion. > | > |You seem to think that I am belligerently hanging onto the idea of > |delivering Jetty in a single file, which needs unpacking, editing and > |repacking in order to change the port number. > | > |If this is not the case - apologies > | > |If it is - WAKE UP (I'm allowed to raise my voice here, because I am > |following precedent). > | > |I have suggested delivering the jetty-plugin UNPACKED numerous times (as > |you will now find it if you build HEAD). > | > |There is NO unpack/repack needed to edit the configuration. You just > |edit deploy/jetty-plugin.sar/META-INF/jboss-service.xml. > | > |If I see one more reference to having to pack/repack the sar, I > |will go mad. > | > |The only difference between what you suggest and I suggest is the > |location of the Jetty files. > | > |You want to split them up (into 2 different dirs) across the JBoss > | distrib. > | > |I want to keep them together (in 1 dir), so that it is clearer exactly > |which parts of JBoss constitute Jetty, in order that anyone can replace > |that module trivially. > | > |I can't make it much clearer than that. > | > |I don't think that anyone has made a decent case for not having the > |Jetty impl present in the deploy directory. The plugin (impl and cfg) IS > |a deployable. > | > |However in the interests of conformity and world peace, I shall fall on > |my sword and repackage Jetty according to a greater wisdom. > | > |Ouch :-) > | > | > |Jules > | > | > |P.S. > | > |Did anyone actually have anything constructive to say about where Jasper > |should go ? > | > |Jason Dillon wrote: > |> dislcaimer, a few beers in me after the laker game... > |> > |>>The natural progression of all this separation of config and > |>>implementation is that we will begin encouraging people to take all the > |>>resources out of their ears and deploy them in lib/, then just drop the > |>>dds into deploy/. > |> > |> Who gives a fuck? My point from the begining was that you are > | > |forcing users to > | > |> unpack the fucking sar to change the config... which they will want > |> todo. > |> > |>>Ok, so they can edit their descriptors - but it's not J2EE, is it ? > |> > |> Again who cares... j2ee blah. > |> > |>>Likewise, the sar is a nice extension of the J2EE packaging metaphor. > |> > |> Sar is nice when you need to group jars... or if you want to > | > |lock config. I am > | > |> not saying that sar is bad... only that our usage of it with jetty is. > |> > |> WE EXPECT PEOPLE TO CHANGE THE JETTY CONFIG... in fact all of > | > |the times I have > | > |> used JBoss3 in production (both at work and for the website) I > | > |have had to > | > |> change the config. > |> > |>>It may not be perfect, but this is the platform that we are > |>>implementing, and I think consistency is important. > |>> > |>>Comments ? > |> > |> Dude... what is the problem with a .sar/.jar + .xml? 2 files... > | > |big deal... > | > |> tell me what the problem is and we can work a solution. I have > | > |already told you > | > |> over and over and now over agaion of the problem of shipping the > | > |jetty config > | > |> inside of a sar. > |> > |> I am sorry if I seem harsh, but I think that the answere is > | > |obvious... but you > | > |> are still balking on it... why? > |> > |> --jason > |> > |> > |> ------------------------------------------------- > |> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ > |> > |> _______________________________________________________________ > |> > |> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > |> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > |> > |> _______________________________________________ > |> Jboss-development mailing list > |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > | > |_______________________________________________________________ > | > |Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > |August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > | > |_______________________________________________ > |Jboss-development mailing list > |[EMAIL PROTECTED] > |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development