> > As you may know, we are going in a different direction with > JMS than > > the original architecture coded by Norbert Lataille. We > are doing a > > rewrite > > I guess I had it good. Norbert made a good start. At least > basic pub/sub worked. That's better than starting from scratch.
Enough of this already! You give credit where credit is due. Norbert Lataille did 80% of the work, you and David Maplesden did the 20% needed for a solid release, but the "better than starting from scratch" doesn't give credit. > You may be right. or wrong. The current JMS will ship until > there is a better replacement. Do you plan to replace the The current JMS rewrite by Nathan, Adrian, and Bela is going quite well and we will be replacing the old system in the fall. Don't work on a codebase that is going to be retired and needs to live in depracated mode for awhile. A refactoring isn't what is needed in the JMS subsystem. As scott asked you, please make sure you communicate with nathan, the lead on JMS implementation. Otherwise your work will fall by the wayside. Also the forums are a good place to sync up or ask for clarifications. marcf ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
