> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram > Chirino > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: c/s JBossMQ status, was: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ rewrite > > > On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 23:41, Nathan Phelps wrote: > > In line... > > > Hiram, > > > > As you may know, we are going in a different direction with JMS than the > > original architecture coded by Norbert Lataille. We are doing a rewrite > > I guess I had it good. Norbert made a good start. At least basic > pub/sub worked. That's better than starting from scratch. > > > so patches to the old JBossMQ have a limited lifetime. That means that > > changes made to the old JBossMQ will most likely not be part of HEAD or > > the distribution as we move forward. > > You may be right. or wrong. The current JMS will ship until there is a > better replacement. Do you plan to replace the current implementation > with the peer based implementation you have been working on? >
No, the peer based implementation will only be a flavor. As you already know, multicast can't be used for everything. Bill ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
