> If we know that your cluster is using session affinity, there are a > large number of optimisations that we can make, which will result in a > faster service for you.
> I will be checking in an updated implementation of distributable > sessions for Jetty shortly, which I shall then spend some time > optimising in this way. Ok. But that is a feature to come? There is no optimization at this time? I mean, there is no advantage at this time? > You would be well advised to use session affinity if you can. If you > don't you are simply making a lot more work for your cluster. Well, I am trying to understand WHY I am doing more work for my cluster this way. Can you explain that? Lets supose the replication occurs without problems, the requests are spaced in time no there are no problems in incoerent states. Is there a penalty (memory usage, performace, or whatever) for not directing the requests to the same instance? Why? ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
