How do you know you are always getting the same connection? Is your useage multithreaded so you have 30 simultaneous transactions? If you have only one thread at a time, using only one connection is entirely appropriate.
david jencks On 2002.11.06 12:53:10 -0500 Giorgio Ponza wrote: > I'd like to ignore the message but i tell u this. > If i use Jboss 2.4.4 with a ConnectionPool of 30, if i run JMeter for a > test, it uses different connections. > If i use JBoss 2.4.9 with a ConnectionPool of 30, it always returns the > first and only connection created during startup, ignoring the others 29. > The bad is that JBoss gets effectively all the connection needed (in this > case 30), but in effect the connectionPool contains only 1, the first in > the > warning startup message. > Tx for answer > > Giorgio > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:16 PM > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss 2.4.8+ BUG in XAConnection Pool > > > > You can probably ignore this message without ill effects. > > > > david jencks > > > > On 2002.11.06 09:33:44 -0500 Giorgio Ponza wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > I've posted weeks ago explaining my problem, but got no response. > > > My problem is that when i start JBoss 2.4.8 and 2.4.9 WITHOUT doing > any > > > configuration changes, it says > > > > > > WARN,XAConnectionFactory] XAConnectionImpl: > > > org.jboss.pool.jdbc.xa.wrapper.XAConnectionImpl@53c375 has no current > tx! > > > > > > when he tries to create a pool for the example DB Hypersonic > > > I've tried to configure my own datasource, but when i try to get a > new > > > connection from the pool, it always returns the same connection, also > if > > > i've set the MaxSize to 30 (and MinSize to 0). > > > The problem is solved if i use my JBoss 2.4.4 server. > > > I've read all the config files, but them are perfectly EQUALS, so i > think > > > i > > > can't do more to solve my problem. > > > Is this a BUG in JBoss 2.4.8+ or not? and if yes, is there any > > > possibilities > > > it can be solved? Someone has a "workaround". > > > Maybe you can say "use JBoss 3.0+". OK, but where can i find some > > > informations about the migration? i know it's not simple. > > > Tx all > > > > > > Giorgio Ponza > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm > > > Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! > > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en > > > _______________________________________________ > > > JBoss-user mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm > > Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en > > _______________________________________________ > > JBoss-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm > Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user