Hi, >Ah its probably just a bug then, the MUC component is probably thinks for >some reason you support MUC, maybe implementing MUC will help.
Implementing MUC may help, but I can not afford the traffic. I can not spend more than the <presence/> because I join/leave many rooms. We are (again) taling about virtual presence and creating/joining rooms while browsing the Web. One room per Web site. Works well, but I don't want to configure each room. They should all have the same config anyway. Is it possible to supply a default config for "instant" rooms in the jabberd.xml config? hw -- Dr. Heiner Wolf bluehands GmbH & Co.mmunication KG http://www.bluehands.de/people/hw +49 (0721) 16108 75 -- Jabber enabled Virtual Presence on the Web: www.lluna.de Open Source Future History: www.galactic-developments.de >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf >Of Richard Dobson >Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 6:30 PM >To: Jabber software development list >Subject: Re: [jdev] MU-Conference returning "Not Found" > > >> Yes, this is what makes me wonder. If the room is locked >then it behaves >> like a MUC, not like GroupChat, although I sent only: > >> <presence >> id='6fc2184f6e38' >> >> >to='[EMAIL PROTECTED] >ehands.de/heiner' >> /> > >Ah its probably just a bug then, the MUC component is probably >thinks for >some reason you support MUC, maybe implementing MUC will help. > >Richard > > >
