Do you want to include *all* XHTML content? Scripts? Media objects? Forms?
If so, feel free to write up a spec for that. To me, it seems like a bad idea.
Peter JD Conley wrote:
We (especially Chris Mullins) also brought this up many many many many many many many times during the experimental stages of this XEP.... Of course, there is nothing stopping you from creating a XHTML-Body XEP that allows free form... -JD-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Gnauck Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:12 AM To: jdev@jabber.org Subject: [jdev] Re: XHTML-IM XEP implementation Hi Tomasz, i brought up this discussion multiple times in the past. As you said creating the X-HTML is the biggest problem. Anotherproblemis that we allow only a small subset of tags and attributes. There are toolkits which you can use to create (X)HTML, but the output is not valid according to the XEP. Which means to have to modify the output again to get XHTML which is valid according to the XEP. I used IE on Windows and Gecko on Linux which are the most common toolkits to display and create (X)HTML. I think we need another XEP which doesn't restrict the developers to only this small subset of tags. If we wanna move forward withxmpp-mailthen we need it. Alex
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature