On 3/11/09 9:18 PM, Justin Karneges wrote: > I didn't disagree with your > vision. In fact, this idea of a collaborative, open, world-wide service > sounds incredible, if you can pull it off and maintain five nines. :) I just > don't think using the name "Jabber" is wise. A giant service named Jabber, > with a client named Jabber (JIM? :)) only adds naming confusion, and may be > perceived by competitors as unfair (we want them to use the word "Jabber" as > much as possible, and not be afraid of it).
We could call it FreeTalk or something, but that name is already taken: http://www.gnu.org/software/freetalk/ http://share.skype.com/sites/skypegear/2008/01/skypegear_roadtest_freetalk_st.html
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org _______________________________________________
