Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 07:48 +0100, Ghee Teo wrote: > >> #!/bin/sh >> # >> # Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. >> # Use is subject to license terms. >> # >> # Preinstall script will check if zfssnap role already exists >> # and add it if necessary >> /usr/bin/grep "^zfssnap:" $BASEDIR/etc/passwd > /dev/null >> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then >> /usr/sbin/roleadd -d /export/home/zfssnap -c "ZFS Automatic Snapshots >> role" \ >> >> GT> You are making the assumption that /export/home is available on the >> machine >> which I don't think it is always correct. I know users-admin does use >> /export/home >> as default, not sure if it checks for its presence or not. >> >> -P "ZFS File System Management" \ >> -A solaris.smf.manage.zfs-auto-snapshot -m zfssnap >> /usr/bin/passwd -r files -N zfssnap >> # make sure zfssnap's PATH has /usr/sbin in it >> echo "PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin" >> /export/home/zfssnap/.profile >> echo "export PATH" >> /export/home/zfssnap/.profile >> fi >> > > Actually, this is totally wrong. On Nevada, it would try to add a > role on the system where the installer is running (e.g. the install DVD > or the BE you're LUing from) and on the system you're > installing/upgrading. I'm also wondering why a role needs a home > directory, is it only for adding /usr/sbin to the PATH? Can you > not make zfs-auto-snapshot not depend on /usr/sbin being in the PATH? > > I know I asked you about this but forgot the answer: is this package > going into Nevada? > Sorry, forgot to answer this in the previous reply. This package wasn't targeted for Nevada originally but we were told that the path to integration into OpenSolaris 2008.11 was to deliver into Nevada. So I guess the answer is yes :)
> Laca > > >
