Paolo Castagna wrote: > Hi, what should we do about this? Just to clarify.
I replied to Andy's comments in this thread and with changes in SVN, but I did not ignored his +1 vote. Therefore, I didn't think it was necessary to cut another RC since there aren't major issues. In the meantime, the [VOTE] for graduating Jena came. I see two options: 1. release LARQ before graduating 2. release LARQ after graduation If you want to suggest a third option, I am open and happy to help. My third option at the moment would not be constructive, so omitted. :-) Paolo > > Paolo > > Paolo Castagna wrote: >> Hi, >> here is the vote on a release build for Jena LARQ 1.0.0 >> >> Staging repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-100/ >> >> Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area: >> http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/ >> >> Keys: >> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jena/KEYS >> >> SVN tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jena/Jena2/LARQ/tags/jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating-RC-1/ >> >> The module is tagged with the version and "RC-1" to denote the first release >> candidate for this release cycle. If voted on successfully, the tag will be >> changed ("svn mv") to the same name but minus >> the RC-1. >> >> >> Please vote to approve this release: >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... >> >> This vote will be open to the end of >> >> Sunday 26/March 23:59 UTC >> (72 hours from the same hour tonight). >> >> Paolo
