On 27/03/12 17:07, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Robert Vesse wrote:
I would release now as we have several more rounds of emails and votes to get
through before Jena actually gets to graduate, namely:
- Proposed Resolution Discussion on [email protected]
- Resolution vote on [email protected]
- Board Meeting (which is third monday of month so if we time everything nicely
we may get graduation approved by end of April)
Hi Rob
We currently have two +1 from committers, vote has closed.
I think it is possible to run the [VOTE] for longer an wait to
see if another vote comes (if it is necessary) before sending
the [VOTE] on [email protected]. But, I am not sure about this.
I assumed my [VOTE] was implicit, but I guess it is a wrong
assumption, so I explicitly voted now (but after the deadline).
Is such vote valid?
Two +1's so far.
Is this vote really closed? I don't see a CLOSED message. The deadline
is really just the earliest time when you can declare a RESULT and close
it with a positive outcome because you have then timed out on any -1's.
Voting after the named deadline is all too common.
What do you want to do? Having said it's closed in this message,
without a message tagged as such, leaves it in an uncertain state. Time
to collapse that wave function.
Andy
Will the [VOTE] for LARQ be the last [VOTE] for a release of a
module before sending the [VOTE] for graduation or we need/want
to release SDB as well before that?
Paolo
