> > I do not suggest to go with 2.198 so this really is about 2.204 with or > without JENKINS-58993 enforcement. >
2.204 is fine with me since we keep our options open for this issue while we evaluate workarounds On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 3:02 PM 夏润泽 <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know much about the jenkins master. > I only commented on the JCasC issue. > I have the same idea as James, *no level of dataloss is acceptable*. > So I will choose 2.199+ as the base line for the next lts. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/2hPMwmZDZFg/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e3f32aba-061b-4218-aed4-702c834737ad%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e3f32aba-061b-4218-aed4-702c834737ad%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPfivLCNOW%2B63e17nZRBpWfUEdem-81Npf1O5ODims2cBkGfmQ%40mail.gmail.com.
