On 21/11/2019 13.20, Daniel Beck wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:40 PM Oliver Gondža <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Are we ok to see how the JCasC PR is doing before committing to an LTS baseline?Are you suggesting we go with 2.198 if the JCasC PR doesn't work out? Or does 'baseline' include a distinction between '2.204' and '2.204 with LTS only revert of 58993'?
Good point. I do not suggest to go with 2.198 so this really is about 2.204 with or without JENKINS-58993 enforcement.
Are there any objections to choosing 2.204 as the next baseline and iron out what to do about JENKINS-58993 in next two weeks?
-- oliver -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/11be6366-215c-a86f-83a3-faa80835f42a%40gmail.com.
