I can not speak to Config As Code, but the issue I found that lead me to write the code in Jenkins in the first place was reported reliably by one of CloudBees' customers (they could hit it every single time). I also saw this on my internal issue sometimes (we randomly lost the cloud configuration and some views) but it was random and we often didn't notice for a bit.
in order to reproduce it I had to write https://github.com/jenkinsci/make-jenkins-slow-plugin . basically it is a combination of what is in config.xml of Jenkins (the more the merrier because it slows down deserialisation etc), number of cores (more cores more parallel init reactor tasks IIRC), speed of disk and which way the wind is blowing. On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 7:26:04 PM UTC, ogondza wrote: > > Do we have an idea of how often this manifests? > > On 20/11/2019 19.00, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/O_g1kk39TBQ is > > quite related to this thread. > > We might want to consider 2.198 as a baseline, just for discussion. > > > > On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 3:49:31 PM UTC+1, Oleg Nenashev > wrote: > > > > 2.205 exploded due to > > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-60199 > > <https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-60199>, but IIUC it > > could be mitigated by upgrade guidelines. > > It discourages selecting 2.205 s the new LTS baseline anyway, IMHO > > needs more soak testing for other possible regressions > > > > +1 for 2.204. It has some negative community ratings, but I do not > > see particular issues in JIRA which would block it. > > All changes are relatively minor, and 2.203 ratings were fine. > > > > In 2.204 we would really want to have > > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-59679 > > <https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-59679> from Zbynek so > > that we can proceed with plugin documentation migration.without > > impacting UX for LTS users. > > > > Best regards, > > Oleg > > > > On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 3:05:23 PM UTC+1, Jesse Glick > wrote: > > > > 2.204 sounds reasonable. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > > an email to [email protected] <javascript:> > > <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:>>. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/a3026a36-8f17-4804-98d3-cc70c24a7d75%40googlegroups.com > > > < > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/a3026a36-8f17-4804-98d3-cc70c24a7d75%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. > > > > > -- > oliver > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/3d022018-0238-4e25-bd16-5868a8b9c3a5%40googlegroups.com.
