Hi all,
Well, after much churning with Stateful/Stateless
Session Beans (& Entity Beans) I am beginning to re-think why
I would want to integrate JESS with EJBs. I finally
arrived at the notion of using pure JMS Messaging and having
JESS situated within a client to interact with the
message content. Ironically, two of the most successful projects
that I have seen in 15 years used this
architecture.
On the other hand, EJBs seem to have many
constraints that preclude the notion of a "constant service". i.e.,
JESS providing a state-based inferencing service
for clients. My test for the JESS/EJB integration would be to
use the "pumps/tanks" example found in the JESS
code section. The PropertyChangeSupport seems to throw
a BIG monkey wrench into the EJB machine.
It also seems that many of the EJB constraints
are geared towards precluding the use of
multi-threaded code (my opinion).
So, for the future I will direct my attention
towards using a JMS/JESS layered architecture. Obviously, the
"pumps/tanks" example will not work as written but
I'm sure some event-based message work-around could be
formulated to achieve the same effect. Surely the
message latency cannot be any worse than the "blocking"
of the RMI-based EJBs.
Anyhoo - that is my thought for the
day.
|
Title: RE: JESS: JESS & EJB
- Re: JESS: JESS &... ejfried
- Re: JESS: JESS &... rhalsey007
- Re: JESS: JESS &... James Patterson
- Re: JESS: JESS &... rhalsey007
- Re: JESS: JESS &... kkonaka
- JESS: Rete Seria... x xu
- JESS: Rete Manjula Dissanayake
- Re: JESS: Rete S... ejfried
- Re: JESS: Rete S... x xu
- Re: JESS: Rete S... ejfried
- RE: JESS: JESS & EJB ... rhalsey007
- RE: JESS: JESS &... Alan Moore
- RE: JESS: JESS &... Alan Moore
- Re: JESS: JESS &... michel denis @+33.6.72.87.17.50
- Re: JESS: JESS &... rhalsey007
- Re: JESS: JESS & EJB Burton . P . Grimm