Hi Gerry,
sounds a good idea that the Jetspeed and Keel folks should talking about
"their" platform to each other..
_______________________________________________
Mit freundlichen Gru?en ... best regards...
Can Uenal
CEO
iCore effective GmbH
Robert-Bosch Str. 7
64293 Darmstadt
+49-(0)6151/872 - 5050,
mobile: +49-(0)172-6638161
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Gerry Reno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 22:49
An: Jetspeed Users List
Betreff: Re: keelframework for jetspeed2
Can,
I take a slightly different view of all the frameworks under Jakarta.
I think it is actually a strength of open source to enable so many
good albeit differing technologies to compete. Open source has enabled
software evolution on steroids. Difficult for architects to keep up -
you bet.
Although I haven't looked at Keel in depth it seems like a good idea.
Surround individual technologies with decorators that allow them to be
plugged into the Keel framework so that you can add/remove/replace
contributing best-of-breed technologies without major effort. Ok, but
the last time I looked at Keel (about a month ago) it really didn't
have all the pieces in places yet. It had a core but a lot of the
surrounding pieces were not done. Might be worth some time for
Jetspeed developers to talk with the Keel team and see exactly where
they are.
Gerry Reno
--- Can Uenal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Gerry,
>
> please keep in mind that one of the top weaknesses of the Jakarta
> project
> are the existing different concurrent frameworks like Avalon, Struts,
> Turbine, etc. It is very complicated and confusing for a lot of
> architects,
> developers and last but least potential customers why an opensource
> platform
> will offer so many frameworks and the most important question is,
> when & why
> should someone use one of these frameworks in which topic.
>
> Why not using an approach like Keel which seems definetely not alpha.
> Jetspeed 2 should come up with more enhancements than some better UI
> stuff
> or more portlets.
>
>
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Gerry Reno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 17:58
> An: Jetspeed Users List
> Betreff: Re: keelframework for jetspeed2
>
>
> Ender,
> I don't think Keel (an expansion of the Expresso concepts) is near
> ready for prime time. It is still very young.
> Avalon would definitely be a good backbone for lifecycle
> management.
>
> Gerry Reno
>
>
> --- Ender_Hikmet_KILIGOPLU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you must see it before makin a choice for jetspeed2
> > design.May be
> > not complete solution but usage of avalon must be implemented.
> >
> > http://www.keelframework.org/
> >
> >
> > ENder
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
