"Thomas F. Boehme" wrote:
>
> Raphael,
>
> "getAllowMaximize()" (and the corresponding maximization, for that matter)
> does not have to do with a portlet being editable or not.
> But apart from that I would agree that having an "Editable/Customizable/<any
> other suggested name>" interface to derive from has its merits.
>
> Back to "getAllowMaximize()": is there still some enthusiasm about window
> manager-style stuff included in a future Portlet API (something like along
> the lines of event handling for maximize, minimize, restore, close, etc) ?
>
You're right. Customizable should not deal with the window manager like
features but only with edition/customization properties.
Is there any use for allowing the Portlet to specifically alter the
maximize/minimize/close operations which never alter the portlet
content itself ?
I think most of the functionality can be achieved by using different
controls (or by allowing parameters in the control markup) eg:
<control name="EditableBoxControl">
<parameter name="allowMax" value="no"/>
<parameter name="allowMin" value="yes"/>
</control>
Any opinions on this ?
--
Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]