Raphael,
> > The thing that mentioned below is required too! That's the "what does
the
> > portlet allow" aspect of window-management, which I would attach to
portlets
> > rather than portlet controls. For example, an advertisement portlet
should
> > be non-closeable for all PSMLs. Therefore, those restrictions should be
> > placed with the portlet registration.
> >
>
> Are you sure that an advertisement portlet will always want to be non
> closeable ? This is in my opinion a decision to be made by the
> portal administrator, not the portlet developper and thus should be
> set/get independantly of the Portlet itself.
>
> Basically, I'd say:
>
> Portlet API = developer realm
> Registry = system administrator realm
> User PSML = user/sysadm realm
>
> By this logic, I'd support extending the registry syntax to let
> the administrator decide whether a portlet should always be visible.
>
> Does that makes sense to you ?
Absolutely. I thought that's what I had written too, but maybe I was
misstating myself. Of course, an ad portlet should not be non-closeable for
all portals. It should definitely be up to the portal admin to decide on
that.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
