> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raphael Luta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Montag, 13. November 2000 11:26
> To: JetSpeed
> Subject: Re: editable portlets for release 1.2
> 
> 
> "Schwarz, Marcus" wrote:
> > 
> > Additionally we have added for each portlet some special 
> tags inside of the
> > registry, which are handling the related URLs:
> > 
> >             <functions>
> >                 <function name="maximize">
> >                     <url>http://finance.yahoo.com</url>
> >                 </function>
> >             </functions>
> > 
> > here one can specify which URL should be called if the 
> button is pushed. The
> > current way to allways call the same URL for each portlet 
> (OK, it's a
> > dynamic
> > one, but still...) is surely not enough. In the above 
> approach you can
> > dynamically
> > e.g. call a configuration URL of the portlet. Another 
> possibility is surely
> > to put these information into the "parameters" area of a 
> portlet-entry.
> > 
> 
> That's a great idea. 
> A PortletControl could definitely query all the available functions 
> on a Portlet and add them to the control bar. 
> Default functions could be registered in the PortletControl entry.
> 
> Sample registry entries:
> 
> <portlet-entry ...>
>       <functions>
>               <function name="maximize">
>                       <url>http://wherever/</url>
>               </function>
>               <!-- override the default behavior to remove 
> the close option -->
>               <function name="close"/>
>               <function name="edit">
>                       <url>my_custom_edit/</url>
>               </function>
>       </functions>
> </portlet-entry>
> 
> <portle-control ..>
>       <functions>
>               <function name="maximize">
>                       <icon>std_maximize_icon</icon>
>                       <url>std_maximize_dynamic_URL</url>
>               </function>
>               <function name="close">
>                       <icon>std_close_icon</icon>
>                       <url>std_close_URL</url>
>               </function>
>               <function name="edit">
>                       <icon>std_edit_icon</icon>
>                       <url>std_edit_URL</url>
>               </function>
>       </functions>
> </portlet-control>
> 
> Did I understand correctly ?

yop. The first part is already implemented. We will integrate it very soon.
Currently we are in a hot phase of a project - so it will take some
days.....

The second stuff is really a cool extension! We will take care of it also,
but it will take a little bit longer since it is not implemented already.

Everybody with comments / suggestions on that?

> 
> --
> Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other:  <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
> Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other:  <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to