> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas F. Boehme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Freitag, 10. November 2000 17:43
> To: JetSpeed
> Subject: Re: editable portlets for release 1.2
>
>
> Raphael,
>
> A maximize may want to re-load certain content, a close may
> have free up
> some resource, etc. It wouldn't be the portlet itself doing
> those things,
> but rather an event listener that the portlet can attach to
> the portlet
> control. Does that make sense?
>
> The thing that mentioned below is required too! That's the
> "what does the
> portlet allow" aspect of window-management, which I would
> attach to portlets
> rather than portlet controls. For example, an advertisement
> portlet should
> be non-closeable for all PSMLs. Therefore, those restrictions
> should be
> placed with the portlet registration.
>
something like this will be available in our implementation of
proposal 4. There one can specifiy inside of the registry, which
functionality (also buttons) will be available to which roles/privileges.
Of course no end-user would have the permission to close an advertisment
portlet :-)
> Cheers,
> Thomas Boehme
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Raphael Luta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "JetSpeed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 17:01
> Subject: Re: editable portlets for release 1.2
>
>
> "Thomas F. Boehme" wrote:
> >
> > Raphael,
> >
> > "getAllowMaximize()" (and the corresponding maximization,
> for that matter)
> > does not have to do with a portlet being editable or not.
> > But apart from that I would agree that having an
> "Editable/Customizable/<any
> > other suggested name>" interface to derive from has its merits.
> >
> > Back to "getAllowMaximize()": is there still some
> enthusiasm about window
> > manager-style stuff included in a future Portlet API
> (something like along
> > the lines of event handling for maximize, minimize,
> restore, close, etc) ?
> >
>
> You're right. Customizable should not deal with the window
> manager like
> features but only with edition/customization properties.
>
> Is there any use for allowing the Portlet to specifically alter the
> maximize/minimize/close operations which never alter the portlet
> content itself ?
>
> I think most of the functionality can be achieved by using different
> controls (or by allowing parameters in the control markup) eg:
>
> <control name="EditableBoxControl">
> <parameter name="allowMax" value="no"/>
> <parameter name="allowMin" value="yes"/>
> </control>
>
> Any opinions on this ?
>
> --
> Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
