falz wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Kyle Gonzales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 09:29:45AM -0400, Kyle Gonzales wrote:
>>>> I know there have been patches and additions sent to the mailing list. >>>> Is >>>> the project still actively maintained? >>> An interesting question. I haven't heard from Javier for a long while. >>> Fixes are easier to put in, I have a few of them in the Debian patches >>> already. The new interface types are more difficult to patch as the >>> IDs will get mixed up. > > On the subject, I wanted to chime in that I realsed some new interface > types a few years ago and they didn't make it into 0.8.3 for whatever > reason, I'm not sure if any got added, mainly due to the ID issue > above. > > http://falz.net/files/jffnms/ > > I can easily make changes to make them fit a specific ID range if I am > told what the next free ID range would be. Maybe Javier is getting burned out? Maybe he is heading in a different direction? Maybe it is time to restructure and expand the development and maintenance teams of jffnms? I've watched lots of eager folks come and go over the years as progress on developing and expanding jffnms seems to be waning. I like others, I have ideas on cool things to add, but, that tree (of possibilities) does not seem to be receptive. Maybe it's time to fork, if an adequate restructuring and expansion of the core development team is not feasible (for whatever reason)? James ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
