On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:24 AM, wireless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that getting jffnms (or a fork) ready for active expansion > and support, is good for any body in the (ethernet) equipment management > space.
Just to note here for the benefit of anyone reading this as an archived post in the future who many be considering using JFFNMS- it can do *much more* than only monitor/manage to devices with Ethernet interfaces! On an unrelated note, fork or not, a different name would probably be a very good thing. :) --falz ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
