Kyle Gonzales wrote: > Craig, you seem to be the #2 guy- do you not have access to commit > code changes? Do you have any other methods to reach Javier other than > whatever info can be found on Google? > > Forks frequently can be a good thing (see Xorg). I'd say that route > should be explored if Javier doesn't want to give access for some > additional people to commit code, but it's probably a good idea to at > least give him a chance to weigh in. > > > I would very much like to keep this discussion alive. I am starting a > service based on the software as it stands now, and I know I will expand > it. Add support for things like rsyslog (as msyslog seems to be dead). > > I would also like to get JFFNMS into Fedora and EPEL. Help expand the > user base if it is available easily packaged in both Debian (courtesy of > Craig) and Fedora, and available for RHEL.
Yea, my ideas is to expand jffnms to manage all sorts of ethernet connected devices. I have worked to get jffnms fully supported in Gentoo: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/jffnms.xml I think that getting jffnms (or a fork) ready for active expansion and support, is good for any body in the (ethernet) equipment management space. There are lots of folks like us that would join a revitalized jffnms development effort. All one has to do, is parse the old postings. CRAIG, Are you interested in taking over a leadership role? (either as part of a revitalized jffnms or a new fork)????? James ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
