Hey Dave -- yes fsck did fix it up, however with alot of stuff in
lost+found. Fortunately I had not moved much over yet so the damage was
very minimal.

Thanks for identifying the JFS version in the 7.3 kernel, I looked but
apparently did not know of the right place =)

I will patch 7.3's kernel up to fix stability. Thanks for the note Scott!
Good to know RH9's kernel has a more modern JFS so when I go to that in a
few months I will not have problems.

You guys are great =)

That's me, kreuch, on #linux btw...

Cheers,

Nicholas J Kreucher
IBM, Systems Architect -- Extreme Blue Silicon Valley
office: (408) 927-3596 (t/l 457)
cell: (517) 974-0260




|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           Dave Kleikamp    |
|         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|         |           m.com>           |
|         |                            |
|         |           03/25/2003 02:30 |
|         |           PM               |
|         |                            |
|---------+---------------------------->
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                    
                                            |
  |       To:       Nicholas J Kreucher/Almaden/[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
                         |
  |       cc:                                                                          
                                            |
  |       Subject:  Re: [Jfs-discussion] kernel BUG at jfs_txnmgr.c:2335               
                                            |
  |                                                                                    
                                            |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




On Tuesday 25 March 2003 15:51, Nicholas J Kreucher wrote:
> Got this the other day and had to power cycle the machine as it
> wouldn't shutdown properly after JFS kieled over.

After rebooting did fsck fix it up, and if so, did you lose anything
(look in lost+found)?  The number of DT_GETPAGE warnings indicate that
there was quite a bit of corruption in the volume (at least in a
directory).

> Machine is an xSeries 340, SMP, running Red Hat 7.3. Kernel is
> 2.4.18-26.7.xsmp. JFS is laid across an externally attached scsi jbod
> configured as raid5 via md.
>
> Concerned that RH7.3's included JFS is unstable... thinking about
> switching to ext3 for the jbod. Thoughts? Will probably upgrade to
> Red Hat 9 within a month.

I'm not sure how up to date the JFS code is in 2.4.18-26.7.xsmp.  I'll
try to find out by tomorrow if there are any known problems that may
have been fixed.

Thanks,
Shaggy
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center




_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to