Hi,
I didn't say I was useing outdated versions of DOS, I just
said that I was running functions that still required DOS to function.
Thanks for your insight,
-----Original Message-----
From: gneufeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, March 26, 1999 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: Sluggish DOS
>Hello.
>
> In response to the message here about using an extremely out-of-date
>version of dos with a 350 MHZ machine, I have a couple of questions, quite
>simple, really. First, if you are going to use a version of dos that does
>not belong to Windows, i.e. dos 7, you cannot implement other versions
>unless you boot directly to them, either with the dual-boot option, offered
>in 95, possibly 98, or with System Commander or another similar program.
>Assuming you know this, why ever would you use an antiquated version of dos
>that is woefully more impoverished than is dos 7 in Windows? Second, what
>functions and/or programs do you have that require dos functions,
>unavailable in Windows' dos 7. Although admittedly diminished, as compared
>with dos 6.2, there are few programs I know of, or functions not available
>in Windows, that would require older versions of dos.
>
>jerry
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
