I dont see that conversion is a big issue to the common masses. Besides, who is preventing you to reconvert these people ? Let us ask questions why these people are giving consent to conversion ? Is conversion is illegal ? Our temples are also is having lot of money. It is more than 336 million. Why not they are converting christian/muslims to Hinduism ? Let religious people deal the subject of conversion. Corruption starts with buying votes through different means. What we are doing when our MPs are selling themselves for votes ? A daily labour is selling his/her vote in 25/- and MPs are selling their votes in 25 crore. It is our attitudes and values that we are to blame for. Let us do something to change this.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 S kumar wrote : > > >And all of us know that many enquiry commissions have indicted seniors for >corruption. Corruption by high and mighty is faced by common mass day in and >day out. > >THE BIGGEST CORRUPTION IN THE COUNTRY IS THE ANNUAL RECEIPT OF US$ 336 MILLION >FROM EVANGELICAL GROUPS TO INDIAN EVANGELISTS AND UTILISING THESE FUNDS >WITHOUT AUDIT OR ACCOUNT, TO ENTICE TRIBALS TO CONVERT TO CHRISTIANITY BY ALL >POSSIBLE MEANS- MONETARY INDUCEMENTS, PRESENTS AND PROMISES. HAVE ANY OF THESE >SO CALLED NGO-S ENGAGED IN CONVERSIONS PUBLISHED THEIR ACCOUNTS AND ACCOUNTED >FOR THE 336 MILLION US$ RECEIVED IN 2006-7? EVEN LALLU YADAV'S CATTLEFEED OR >B'S KICKBACKS WOULD BE PIGMIED COMPARED TO THE EVANGELICAL FUNDS PUMPED INTO >INDIA, AND SEVERAL JOBLESS KERALA CHRISTIANS ENGAGED IN DAILY VISITS TO >CONVERT THE TRIBALS. >AND STILL THESE EVANGELISTS PUBLISH PICTURES OF EMACIATED ILL FED INFANTS IN >TRIBAL AREAS, INSTEAD OF FEEDING THEM USING A MINISCULE OF THESE FUNDS. WHAT >WAS STAINES DOING IN THE ORISSA JUNGLES? YOU WANT DETAILS? > >Innumerable example of intimidation by mightier cousin of human is evident in >all dailies and news channels. >I HAVE ALREADY GIVEN DETAILS OF WHO OWNS THE NEWSCHANNELS AND MEDIA. IT IS >MOSTLY OWNED BY CHRISTIAN GROUPS ABROAD AND WOULD NOT REVEAL ANYTHING THAT >INDICTS EVANGELICAL ACTIVITIES > >--- On Tue, 7/15/08, anindita dey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: anindita dey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [ =>> Jharkhand <<= ] Re Where is the Seniority issue in the >group?: >To: [email protected] >Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008, 12:30 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand.org. in/forum > > > > > > > > >Dear Group, >Sarcasm is an accepted form of expression which I also employed in the said >comment. However, I wonder how someone could ever discover threat perception >from my comments. Well, I do believe that someone has the freedom to read as >per ones will. But at the same time I surely do not believe that the person >concern who prefer selective filtration while reading has freedom to comment >without taking full perspective. If someone feels an intense urge to comment, >the person concern should also take into account my starting sentence- âWe >have seen it here in Jharkhand Group also- seniors spewing unnecessary venom >towards others, other faiths and other customsâ. The inner tale of my >comment is, therefore, to indicate something else. Have you ever noticed some >of the seniors spewing unnecessary venom against others without any >provocation in Jharkhand Group--some of them see evangelical hand in every >curse of society, some want to highjack the > group and dedicate it for a particular section, etc. etc.? I am sure you > have--if not, I wonder if you have ignored these deliberately. I refrain from > naming because that will cast a shade of bad behaviour on myself--at least I > believe so. Senior again doesnât mean older exclusively- -it may denote > higher position in organisation, better established figures in society, > belonging to so called higher strata in caste system, so on and so forth. And > all of us know that many enquiry commissions have indicted seniors for > corruption. Corruption by high and mighty is faced by common mass day in and > day out. Innumerable example of intimidation by mightier cousin of human is > evident in all dailies and news channels. Psychologically, behaviour is also > reflected in lifestyle. Examples of good behaviour and lifestyle are also set > by the seniors-- as the case of our previous President Honourable APJ Abdul > Kalam and Infy mentor Mr. Narayanamurthy for the > corporate world. Behaviour of juniors, although important, is generally not > imitated by general mass. So, behaviour of seniors set the example. It is > because they have the capability to control people and their situation. Thus > I used âseniorsâ in a broader sense and just used the contemporary > finding to corroborate my contention. Just forget âourâ (Indian) and > âtheirâ (foreigner) business and read my comments in the light of above > facts. > > >--- On Mon, 14/7/08, Dr.V.N. Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote: > > From: Dr.V.N. Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> >Subject: [ =>> Jharkhand <<= ] Re Where is the Seniority issue in the group?: >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.co.in >Date: Monday, 14 July, 2008, 5:27 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand.org. in/forum > > > > >Dear Anandita, > >I think your reference to the European and Foregners' findings based on their >cultural perception does not apply to our conditions and social, cultural >backgrounds. Hence such messages with kind of warnings like 'So beware >seniors, behave yourselves! Read on.......... ......... ..' are unwarranted. I >request you to please explain your case if you have some formal or informal >observation on this issue and where were the seniors wrong. I think that will >benefit us more than giving warnings in e-mails like this. > > > > >I saw your reply in which you mentioned that 'We have seen it here in >Jharkhand Group also- seniors spewing unnecessary venom towards others, other >faiths and other customs.' This is not a convincing reply. I expect you to >tell the group by quoting each of the msg with emphasis where Seniors were >spewing unnecessary venoms ......just because of seniority of age and not for >a good reason or logic. > >I, for one, do not know the age of the group members and in my view no body, >not many of us worry about that. You have quoted a study report of a foreigner >for his own country or his Environment. I do not agree on this. In case you >are serious about it please cite the cases as requested above. > > > > > > >-- >Dr.V.N.Sharma > > > > > > > Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand.org. in/forum > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
