Kumar is the new messiah who will provide jobs to the jobless keralites. Can u 
employ even one of them with your funds, Kumar. Or is your intention to keep 
them jobless and poor. U r  seriously becoming more of a  comic than a clown.
 
U r a perfect quintessential of an armchair critic with a typical dog in the 
manger attitude.Khudh toh kuch nahi karna aur doosro koh bhi tarakhi nahi 
karwana hai. 
 
By the way which christian organisation owns a media company?
 
Cheers
Isaac
 


 
--- On Tue, 7/15/08, S kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: S kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ =>> Jharkhand <<= ] Re Where is the Seniority issue in the 
group?:
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008, 5:45 PM












And all of us know that many enquiry commissions have indicted seniors for 
corruption. Corruption by high and mighty is faced by common mass day in and 
day out. 
 
THE BIGGEST CORRUPTION IN THE COUNTRY IS THE ANNUAL RECEIPT OF US$ 336 MILLION 
FROM EVANGELICAL GROUPS TO INDIAN EVANGELISTS AND UTILISING THESE FUNDS WITHOUT 
AUDIT OR ACCOUNT, TO ENTICE TRIBALS TO CONVERT TO CHRISTIANITY BY ALL POSSIBLE 
MEANS- MONETARY INDUCEMENTS, PRESENTS AND PROMISES. HAVE ANY OF THESE SO CALLED 
NGO-S ENGAGED IN CONVERSIONS PUBLISHED THEIR ACCOUNTS AND ACCOUNTED FOR THE 336 
MILLION US$ RECEIVED IN 2006-7? EVEN LALLU YADAV'S CATTLEFEED OR B'S KICKBACKS 
WOULD BE PIGMIED COMPARED TO THE EVANGELICAL FUNDS PUMPED INTO INDIA, AND 
SEVERAL JOBLESS KERALA CHRISTIANS ENGAGED IN DAILY VISITS TO CONVERT THE 
TRIBALS.
AND STILL THESE EVANGELISTS PUBLISH PICTURES OF EMACIATED ILL FED INFANTS IN 
TRIBAL AREAS, INSTEAD OF FEEDING THEM USING A MINISCULE OF THESE FUNDS. WHAT 
WAS STAINES DOING IN THE ORISSA JUNGLES? YOU WANT DETAILS?
 
Innumerable example of intimidation by mightier cousin of human is evident in 
all dailies and news channels. 
I HAVE ALREADY GIVEN DETAILS OF WHO OWNS THE NEWSCHANNELS AND MEDIA. IT IS 
MOSTLY OWNED BY CHRISTIAN GROUPS ABROAD AND WOULD NOT REVEAL ANYTHING THAT 
INDICTS EVANGELICAL ACTIVITIES
 
--- On Tue, 7/15/08, anindita dey <[EMAIL PROTECTED] co.in> wrote:

From: anindita dey <[EMAIL PROTECTED] co.in>
Subject: Re: [ =>> Jharkhand <<= ] Re Where is the Seniority issue in the 
group?:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.co.in
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008, 12:30 PM





 




 
 Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand.org. in/forum 
 
  






Dear Group,
Sarcasm is an accepted form of expression which I also employed in the said 
comment. However, I wonder how someone could ever discover threat perception 
from my comments. Well, I do believe that someone has the freedom to read as 
per ones will. But at the same time I surely do not believe  that the person 
concern who prefer selective filtration while reading has freedom to comment 
without taking full perspective. If someone feels an intense urge to comment, 
the person concern should also take into account my starting sentence- ‘We 
have seen it here in Jharkhand Group also- seniors spewing unnecessary venom 
towards others, other faiths and other customs’. The inner tale of my comment 
is, therefore, to indicate something else. Have you ever noticed some of the 
seniors spewing unnecessary venom against others without any provocation in 
Jharkhand Group--some of them see evangelical hand in every curse of society, 
some want to highjack the
 group and dedicate it for a particular section, etc. etc.? I am sure you 
have--if not, I wonder if you have ignored these deliberately. I refrain from 
naming because that will cast a shade of bad behaviour on myself--at least I 
believe so. Senior again doesn’t mean older exclusively- -it may denote 
higher position in organisation, better established figures in society, 
belonging to so called higher strata in caste system, so on and so forth. And 
all of us know that many enquiry commissions have indicted seniors for 
corruption. Corruption by high and mighty is faced by common mass day in and 
day out. Innumerable example of intimidation by mightier cousin of human is 
evident in all dailies and news channels. Psychologically, behaviour is also 
reflected in lifestyle. Examples of good behaviour and lifestyle are also set 
by the seniors-- as the case of our previous President Honourable APJ Abdul 
Kalam and Infy mentor Mr. Narayanamurthy for the
 corporate world. Behaviour of juniors, although important, is generally not 
imitated by general mass. So, behaviour of seniors set the example. It is 
because they have the capability to control people and their situation. Thus I 
used ‘seniors’ in a broader sense and just used the contemporary finding to 
corroborate my contention. Just forget ‘our’ (Indian) and ‘their’ 
(foreigner) business and read my comments in the light of above facts.


--- On Mon, 14/7/08, Dr.V.N. Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote:

From: Dr.V.N. Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com>
Subject: [ =>> Jharkhand <<= ] Re Where is the Seniority issue in the group?:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.co.in
Date: Monday, 14 July, 2008, 5:27 PM





 




 
 Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand.org. in/forum 
 
  


Dear Anandita,
 
I think your reference to the European and Foregners' findings based on their 
cultural perception does not apply to our conditions and social, cultural 
backgrounds. Hence such messages with kind of warnings like 'So beware seniors, 
behave yourselves! Read on.......... ......... ..' are unwarranted. I request 
you to please explain your case if you have some formal or informal observation 
on this issue and where were the seniors wrong. I think that will benefit us 
more than giving warnings in e-mails like this.
 



I saw your reply in which you mentioned  that 'We have seen it here in 
Jharkhand Group also- seniors spewing unnecessary venom towards others, other 
faiths and other customs.' This is not a convincing reply. I expect you to tell 
the group by quoting each of the msg with emphasis where Seniors were spewing 
unnecessary venoms ......just because of seniority of age and not for a good 
reason or logic. 
 
I, for one, do not know the age of the group members and in my view no body, 
not many of us worry about that. You have quoted a study report of a foreigner 
for his own country or his Environment. I do not agree on this. In case you are 
serious about it please cite the cases as requested above.
 
 
 
 


-- 
Dr.V.N.Sharma 
 




 
 Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand.org. in/forum 
 
  



 














      

Reply via email to