Hello,

I had been following the discussions on the forum quite intently. As a
journalist who have worked in Gujarat for a considerable amount of time, my
personal observation has been that tribals are okay with conversions and
re-conversions even on a yearly basis.

Yes, and they do not stop worshipping their anmistic gods even after
interventions from religious leaders to include their gods or symbols. I
suppose religion is a personal question and there are benefits of displaying
a religious symbol here and there outside one's hut or wearing it on the
neck.

Once while working on an investigative story before a RSS conclave in the
tribal reaches of Dangs in Gujarat, I came across an interesting fact from a
documentary film maker. I was told that foreign missionaries pay 100 USD
for every conversions or re-conversions done in the area. My friend, the
documentary film maker was often called for such ocassions by Dang
missionaries to document their activities and post these abroad.

In Orissa too a similar picture is apparent and quite openly visible. In
this context I feel like posting a few questions before Father Cedric, Ekka
and Kumar.

What does coversion mean to you? What do you think it achieves for a
organisation, trust or religion? Why would people pay money for such
activities when people in tribal India have the least survivability rate in
the country? Why would not an organisation like RSS or VKS invest in health
infrastructure in these remote areas and win the heart and mind of people in
the lines that the missionaries started doing in pre-independence days?
Maybe there are answers to these and I am not just aware. So anyone in this
forum pls feel free to correct what I suggest here.

regards,
Soumik Dey

-- 
Soumik Dey
+919873519555

Reply via email to