It is quite interesting how mainstream newspapers are reacting to
this. After years of blame Hindutva, now they are changing their
opionion. Better later than never.

Orissa: Here, clashes are not one-sided

2 Sep 2008, 0235 hrs IST, Sandeep Mishra,TNN
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Orissa_Here_clashes_are_not_one-sided/rssarticleshow/3434175.cms

......Last paragraph

"Barakhama offers a sample of how gradual rise in the Christian
population has caused religious intolerance in Kandhamal."

On 9/2/08, prabir chatterjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hopefully the BJD will realize that working with mass murderers is more
> dangerous than working with the Kalinganagar killers.
> Prabir
> --- On Sun, 8/31/08, J.venkata subramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It is heartening to see at least one from the group of communism
> that talks peace and sense . Janardhan Pati ji must take this advice
> straight into the planned instigators of Nandigram, and Kannanore mass
> murders . Will the CPI M take action against the party cadre who
> murdered hundreds in these places ? But then if action is taken the
> heads that roll will be from top down. Buddha to Salim.
>
> Janardhan ji please tell us what happened after your advice.
>
> Venkat
>
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.co.in, janardan pati <j_pati_orissa@ ...>
> wrote:
>>
>> from- janardan pati ,
>> secy. c.p.i.(m).orissa state committee .
>>
>>
>> everyone should condemned the killings of people in orissa or
> elsewhere
>>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -\
> ------------ --------- --------- --
> Every one who has minimum concerned for the society can not support
> any barbaric activities in the name of religion. After all man has made
> religion. Religion came after man. It is man, and only man has built up
> civilisation.
>> My appeal to you all to isolate the criminals and for that kindly use
> your energy.
>> thanking you,
>> janardan pati .
> ============ ========= ========= ========= =========
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to