from- janardan pati ,
         secy. c.p.i.(m).orissa state committee .


everyone should condemned the killings of people in orissa  or elsewhere
   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 i am seeing every day in the net that some educated people are discussing 
about the cause of riot in orissa. there  are causes,no doubt. but simple 
because there are causes,the riot and killing can not be justified .
     The murder of swami laxmananda is a plan one and subsquent killings,rape 
and arson are also planned one. Every one who has minimum concerned for the 
society can not support any barbaric activities in the name of  religion. After 
all man has made religion. Religion came after man. It is man, and only man has 
built up civilisation.
My appeal to you all to isolate the criminals and for that kindly use your 
energy.
          thanking you,
         janardan pati .

--- On Sat, 8/30/08, Francis Minj <min [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Francis Minj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Conversions at the root of carnage in Orissa
To: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, August 30, 2008, 2:36 PM











             




 
 
Jharkhand Forum

 
  




Hello Ventakat Subramaniam,

I appreciate your candid observations. Every Indian would be careful lest 
someone might pull his dhoti from behind, the front part always unfurls, 
beauty, cadence, and history of a celebrated civilization.  Vankat is no 
different in Eulogizing Hindus abroad. I am living outside India and disagree 
with your claim, I do not like to elaborate. It is of course better than what 
we see in India but casteism has its deep roots. Aryasamajis were originally 
inspired by Christians and Christians, especially in Tamilnadu, need to be 
inspired by the Aryasamajis. Venkat forgets to reveal the fact that in that 
region sometimes caste takes precedence over religion.


There are rogue elements in all organizations and religions. It is equally 
wrong to blame the whole religion or organisation for a few wayward, there 
might be some fanatics in there. World Vision might be part of that. Similarly, 
anyone blaming Hinduism outright would totally mistaken. My sense is that 
people are blaming only a section of Hindus, i.e. some organizations. All these 
organizations "adapt" themselves to local contexts. The philosophy of some 
organizations are deplorably divisive and Venkat should also remember that like 
him, Christians also fund Hindu fundamentalist organizations. There is enough 
information on the internet.


Rather than sniffing the complicity of Christians in the North East or any 
other part of India it would be wise to ask some soul searching questions about 
the genuine reasons for such tendencies. It would be quite enlightening to get 
some answers from the North Easterners about their links to extremists. Who 
nurtured them - government, politicians, business community or the Church?  
When women get raped by the armymen, where else will they seek protection? One 
can put up fence to protect the crop but if the fence itself eats the crop 
where do you go? This your Tamil proverb explains the situation well. Naxalbari 
is a Hindu village and extremism originated there.To my knowledge no Christian 
missionary, alien or Indian, was ever involved in incubating and nurturing that 
movement. Each region of the country has its specific issues and we need to 
tackle locally rather than blame the whole organization.


I am convinced Cyprian will seldom be accepted by the Aryasamajis in the place. 
I have also visited the Aryasamjis and haven't been welcomed, also in Tamil 
Nadu. If one place is  Similarly one cannot contest Rajani's personal 
experience.


Francis Minj

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:35 AM, venkata subramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> 
wrote:


















             





 
 
Jharkhand Forum

 
  





Well , well, Cyprian and Anjali

It needs only a pedestrian intellect to know or guess where the mischief came 
from. Well, if you want to know of World Vision and its notorities follow this 
link to know what they did in Sri Lanka-

 
************ ***link is removed by moderator*** ****

I was a contributor to this organisation through my credit card company ten 
years ago but when I knew of their activities, I stopped funding them.


And I request Cyprian to visit Tamilnadu, and suit himself with the 'adivasi' 
type of church for him. No other higher caste church will offer him seats!  But 
I promise Arya Samaj like organisations will initiate him into Sandhya and give 
him the sacred thread, and will introduce him to All the four Vedas. You will 
be really be made into the purohit that you want to be. So get your 
applications typed rightaway. It was your promise. Anjali will also find to her 
utter dismay that no castes are there in Arya samaji world. But for amusement 
she will find many Nadar Christians, Chetty christians, Naidu Christians, 
Reddy(YSR Reddy) christians and so on.


Anyone listening, do not go by those imposters who assume high moral grounds in 
denouncing Hinduism.

For all of you, I have this information. It is not Hinduism that is clinging to 
caste system. It is the secular state of India that is. In one stroke , they 
could have disbanded it in 1947. They did not. Look at the overseas Hindu 
community that has been so successful in spreading Hinduism far and wide. They 
did not carry the casteist tag. Iskcon had , by 2006, purchased 500 odd 
churches in Europe alone and converted them into Iskcon Temples. Villages after 
Villages are followers of Iskcon. The core point is that no force, no 
allopathic medicine in the name of Hallelujah, no harvesting of souls, no 
inquistion, no crusade wars and no aggression did it. Simply the power of 
Hinduistic ideals of Yoga ,and  Dhyana did it. (which these churches are 
desperately trying to ape)


If Cyprian was curious enough to have called up world vision and even the 
Police, why did he not have the same urge to clarify that with Pioneer ? I have 
come across many net articles to show the complicity of the Church and comrades 
and maoists. They replace one another in many places. The maoistsin Nepal are 
principally a christian force. He can get enough material from the net.


The christists have only one agenda in India. That of grabbing the nation. They 
already have pocketed Northeast where a religious separatist struggle is on 
with the full backing of the Church. Ask any army man who has served in the 
north east and he will tell you with anger the complicity of the Church in the 
separatist insurgency. See this

http://www.stephen- knapp.com/ baptist_church_ backs_terrorism. htm

I was also a simple , so called apologetic Hindu fed day in and day out by the 
pseudo secular media about these ' innocent Christian' acts. But thanks to 
internet and the growing awareness among Hindus about their unique identity, 
************ ********* ******* I am no longer apologetic about my Identity and 
if someone wishes to call me Right winger, or Hindutva man , I would rather 
welcome it. But let the comments come from right minded people , not from 
pseudos and christists.

 



Venkat

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:01 AM, anjali deshpande <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> 
wrote:



















             






 
 
Jharkhand Forum

 
  



this comes straight from the heart! it was the best i have read yet in 
this 'academic' discussion. hindus don't convert because they don't which caste 
to prescribe to the convert. many years ago, in 1981 i think, a hand full of 
us activists, mostly women, had published a leaflet with a series of questions 
including one to the effect, 'if all hindus are one, will any dalit be allowed 
to become a shankaracharya?' we were distributing it at a rally of hindus at 
india gate in delhi when we were attacked, the clothes of one of our friends 
were torn off, the other was beaten up badly and they could escape only because 
a male activist friend joined the 'mob' and said 'hinduism prevents us from 
doing worse things to women so get away,' and an autorickshaw luckily came our 
way. these people are dangerous!



 
in the northeast too the 'parivar' is trying hard to coopt 'tribal' gods, build 
temples where there are none (and why should there be if the people till now 
lived without needing them?) and christians are building churches (why is there 
any need for them if people managed without them for so long?).



 
why should identity depend on some buildings devoted to some gods and some 
rituals? that is what we need to ask and we need to understand how the 
promotion of identity politics at the international level is being reflected 
and is stirring up the already murky waters of religious politics in our 
country. but that becomes academic too!



 
i had begun this only to tell you how your response touched my heart. got 
carried away.
 
anjali deshpande
 
On 8/29/08, Cyprian Ekka <[EMAIL PROTECTED] co.in> wrote:






 






 
 
Jharkhand Forum



 
  






Please stop the 'academic' discussion. I am a born Christian, as you may guess 
from my name. And, hold your fanatic breath, I am a tribal too. Who should know 
better if my ancestors were Hindus or not? They never were. And I am proud they 
weren't (even if I weren't a Christian). I still follow my ancestral religion, 
customs and traditions. I pray to the 'tribal' God (sic) and Christian God too. 
Todate they have not quarelled with one another. Neither has the Church told me 
not to pray to a 'tribal' God. Why should anyone else have a problem with that? 
Incidently, I feel doubly fortunate not to have fallen prey to the Vanwasi 
Kalyan Ashramites, who seem to develp ulcer calling me an Adivasi. The Saffrons 
want me to 'return' to Hinduism, right? Watch out! Return, you said? What 
return? Where return? Who is the oldest dweller of the soil, the blood curdling 
fanatics or Adivasis? Is that not why my 'Adivasiyat' has been recycled into 
'Vanvasiyat'? If I
 wish, I may embrace Hinduism right now (online, if Vedas certify it as valid). 



 
May I ask the Saffron brigage if they will grant me a Brahmin's status and make 
me the chief pujari at Puri temple or Akshardham temple or what have you? If 
yes, I may start typing an application letter right away. But don't tell me to 
hate other religions and their followers. That's not the Hinduism I may love to 
convert to. I studied Hinduism and several other Indian religions. None taught 
me to hate others. I can recite and comment on some shlokas of Bhagwadgeeta off 
the bat. I even meditate on them. I loved watching 'Ramayan' tele-serial and 
have already read the Hindu epics with relish. I love to participate in 
spiritual discourses of some Hindu sects (certainly not those sponsored by the 
Brigade). Which edition of Hinduism are you talking about?



 
Cyprian Ekka

---






    __._,_























 




 
Jharkhand Forum
Jharkhand Forum  |  Jharkhand Blog  |  Jharkhand Video  |  Jharkhand Network
 
  




























      

Reply via email to