Looks fine to me, too.
Btw, I thought Mandy had earlier suggested
jdk.tools.jlink.internal.packager as a name, but it's currently
jdk.tools.internal.packager (without the jlink). I don't care one way or
the other and the current one is shorter.
-- Kevin
Mandy Chung wrote:
On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Chris Bensen <chris.ben...@oracle.com> wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cbensen/JDK-8150990/webrev.00/
This looks okay to me. This is an interim solution to greatly simplify FX coordination with jlink API change during jdk9 development.
I can sponsor it and push it to jdk9-dev.
Mandy
