To be honest I messed up. I noticed when I was building and testing just before sending out the review. I kinda liked it after I noticed but I’m good with either one.
Chris > On Apr 27, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Mandy Chung <mandy.ch...@oracle.com> wrote: > > >> On Apr 27, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >> Looks fine to me, too. >> >> Btw, I thought Mandy had earlier suggested jdk.tools.jlink.internal.packager >> as a name, but it's currently jdk.tools.internal.packager (without the >> jlink). I don't care one way or the other and the current one is shorter. > > I don’t have a preference on either one. This is just temporary and this may > go away when jlink API is simplified and becomes stable (something to revisit > later). > > Mandy >
