> On Apr 27, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > Looks fine to me, too. > > Btw, I thought Mandy had earlier suggested jdk.tools.jlink.internal.packager > as a name, but it's currently jdk.tools.internal.packager (without the > jlink). I don't care one way or the other and the current one is shorter.
I don’t have a preference on either one. This is just temporary and this may go away when jlink API is simplified and becomes stable (something to revisit later). Mandy
