hanyuzheng7 commented on code in PR #14523: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14523#discussion_r1356034620
########## streams/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/integration/IQv2StoreIntegrationTest.java: ########## @@ -863,6 +863,14 @@ private <T> void shouldHandleWindowKeyQueries(final Function<T, Integer> extract mkSet() ); + shouldHandleWindowKeyQuery( + 2, Review Comment: ok, I will fix it. This isn't the new test case I introduced; it's the previous one. However, the outcome has now changed. The previous like this ``` // tightest possible start range shouldHandleWindowKeyQuery( 2, Instant.ofEpochMilli(WINDOW_START), Instant.ofEpochMilli(WINDOW_START), extractor, mkSet(2) ); ``` this time the answer is mkSet() -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org