hanyuzheng7 commented on code in PR #14523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14523#discussion_r1356034620
##########
streams/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/integration/IQv2StoreIntegrationTest.java:
##########
@@ -863,6 +863,14 @@ private <T> void shouldHandleWindowKeyQueries(final
Function<T, Integer> extract
mkSet()
);
+ shouldHandleWindowKeyQuery(
+ 2,
Review Comment:
ok, I will fix it. This isn't the new test case I introduced; it's the
previous one. However, the outcome has now changed.
The previous like this
```
// tightest possible start range
shouldHandleWindowKeyQuery(
2,
Instant.ofEpochMilli(WINDOW_START),
Instant.ofEpochMilli(WINDOW_START),
extractor,
mkSet(2)
);
```
this time the answer is mkSet()
I should I add comment in this one like
```
// tightest possible start range
shouldHandleWindowKeyQuery(
2,
Instant.ofEpochMilli(WINDOW_START),
Instant.ofEpochMilli(WINDOW_START),
extractor,
mkSet()
);
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
