kirktrue commented on code in PR #14670:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14670#discussion_r1387286879
##########
clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumerTest.java:
##########
@@ -222,42 +214,74 @@ public void cleanup() {
}
}
- @Test
- public void testMetricsReporterAutoGeneratedClientId() {
+ private static Collection<Arguments> bothGroupProtocols() {
+ return
Arrays.stream(GroupProtocol.values()).map(Arguments::of).collect(Collectors.toList());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * A given test may choose to use the {@link GroupProtocol#GENERIC generic
group protocol} for a number of reasons.
+ * Among the reasons for a test to do so is because it...
+ *
+ * <ul>
+ * <li>
+ * ...exercises rebalancing logic that is not yet implemented in
the
+ * {@link GroupProtocol#CONSUMER consumer group protocol}.
+ * </li>
+ * <li>...includes topic metadata that is not yet implemented in the
consumer group protocol.</li>
+ * <li>...fails, possibly due to the omission of functionality in the
consumer group protocol.</li>
+ * <li>...uses logic, timing, etc. that are not applicable to the
consumer group protocol.</li>
+ * </ul>
+ *
+ * Less than half of the tests for the consumer group protocol pass as of
now, but it's very tedious to
+ * investigate at this point due to known bugs and missing functionality.
+ */
Review Comment:
> It would be better to group them somehow
Sounds good. I'll start the investigation and open Jiras as I find new
causes.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
