2008/5/7 Steve Kapinos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The overall goal is to have a monitoring thread running in paralell to a > second thread that is running tests. The second thread will continually > be looping running tests and recording (and hopefully adding assertions) > to the response. The first thread running the actual test samplers is > the one that is intended to control how long the test actually runs. > > So the first threadgroup will run for a fixed # of loops. But I want > the second threadgroup to loop 'forever' until the first one is done. > How can I set this up so when the first threadgroup is done, the entire > test plan stops (and any running threads also complete!) > > Can this be done? Better solutions to introducing a monitoring thread > issuing samplers concurrent to your test? > > I see the Result Status Action handler is there that can stop an entire > test, but can't think of a good criteria to check against.. Especially > one that wouldn't abort other threads from the first threadgroup that > have yet to complete. The first threadgroup is configured to execute > multiple threads, each looping a number of times. I in effect, want to > stop the entire test when that entire threadgroup is complete. >
Something like this should work: ThreadGroup1 Loops 1 + Loop Controller Loops N + + Main test + TestAction StopTest + + Synchronizing Timer count=threadcount ThreadGroup2 + etc The timer runs before the sampler(s) to which it applies, so it will wait for all the threads if you set the count to the number of threads > -Steve > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
