Re: [Jmol-developers] Re: [Fwd: Re: two mmCIF issues]

Thu, 04 May 2006 09:47:02 -0700

>> What is the procedure for moving something from "needs testing" to >> "unapproved" > >That's up to the developer. If you think a patch should go into stable, but >just needs a bit more testing, then 'needs testing'. If you feel it is ready >to move to the stable branch, the developer would put it in 'unapproved'. Yes, each developer can move its own modifications from 'needs testing' to 'tested, pending approval' (better label than 'unapproved', thanks bob) >> It seems to me once approved, they should IMMEDIATELY be patched in. Why >> wait after that? > >Patch might have conflicts with the code in the stable branch. I guess in >practice most patches will skip the 'Approved' section, and directly go >into 'Applied'. It's up to who will be in charge of maintaining 10.2. (Who ? ) There's no rush to apply them. It can be easier to apply several patches in one command than apply each patch one after an other. Nico ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to