Brian wrote > On quality, I think that is a different and general concern. We try to > not use poor quality images, so we would try to use only good quality > Jmol data files. I am happy that we restrict the type of jmol files to a > small number, perhaps initially only *.pdb files. Of course we would > have to add file extensions for jmol files to the upload process anyway, > so we would not need to add all possible file extensions.
I'm sorry if I was cryptic. By using Jmol, the WP already would exclude one source of lower quality images, per se. My hopes for advancement already went further, privately, and I took the chance to discuss here what should have been subject on other lists. However, I think your idea to restrict input to the PDB format, together with the demand to give either a ref to a paper, or full data to reproduce the positions (model type, impementation, parameters) would go a long way towards assuring the goal. Regards, ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises looking to deploy the next generation of Solaris that includes the latest innovations from Sun and the OpenSource community. Download a copy and enjoy capabilities such as Networking, Storage and Virtualization. Go to: http://p.sf.net/sfu/opensolaris-get _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
