On 03. 05. 13 14:47, Robert Hanson wrote:




Dear Bob,

Thanks a lot for your reply !

[...]

    Q: Are you OK with ignoring the g orbitals?


    Yes. They should contribute little to the molecular orbitals, which
    I am interested in. Actually, if proceeding so, would it possible to
    ignore 'h' and 'i' functions as well ?



sure. What are the number of orbitals in h/i cartesian/spherical sets?

For h: we have 11 spherical and 21 cartesian functions; and for i: we
have 13 spherical and cartesian functions... if I'm not wrong.  For a
given L, there are (2L+1) spherical harmonic and (L+1)*(L+2)/2
Cartesian functions [Schlegel and Frisch, Int. J. Quantum Chem, 54,
83-87 (1995]




    There seems to be something I'm missing. There are only 492
    listed MO coefficients, but there are 711 listed atomic orbitals.

    711 = 166 s + 84 p(x3) + 34 d(x5) + 15 f(x7) + 2 g(x10)

    Those numbers should match. (NEED to match.)

    Q: So what is 492?


    This really is the number of basis functions: the basis set is made
    of 492 contracted Gaussian functions, consisting each in a linear
    combination of some of the 711 primitive Gaussian functions.
    I guess that the manner in which the MOs are listen takes the
    contractions into account.


I don't see it. Please explain this particular file set in detail. There 301 Gaussian sets listed, not 492.

301 = 166 s + 84 p + 34 d + 15 f + 2 g

For example:

 s  22 1.00
 4316265.0000000    1.0000000000
  646342.4000000    0.0000000000
  147089.7000000    0.0000000000
   41661.5200000    0.0000000000
   13590.7700000    0.0000000000
    4905.7500000    0.0000000000
    1912.7460000    0.0000000000
     792.6043000    0.0000000000
     344.8065000    0.0000000000
     155.8999000    0.0000000000
      72.2309100    0.0000000000
      32.7250600    0.0000000000
      15.6676200    0.0000000000
       7.5034830    0.0000000000
       4.6844000    0.0000000000
       3.3122230    0.0000000000
       1.5584710    0.0000000000
       1.2204000    0.0000000000
       0.6839140    0.0000000000
       0.1467570    0.0000000000
       0.0705830    0.0000000000
       0.0314490    0.0000000000

Each set may have more than one directional component, thus we have total number of independent coefficients:

711 = 166 s + 84 p(x3) + 34 d(x5) + 15 f(x7) + 2 g(x10)

How do you figure that there are only 492 MO coefficients?




(1) My bad ! I was not clear at all. For the Fe atom, for instance, you only have 9 contracted basis functions in the s shell and they are given by linear
combinations of the 22 primitive Gaussian listed above: this can be noted
(22s) -> [9s]. In the example file, I used

for Fe, the cc-pwCVTZ-DK basis set: (22s,18p,10d,3f,2g) -> [9s,8p,6d,3f,2g] for the 6 N and 6 C atoms, the cc-pVTZ-DK basis set: (10s,5p,2d,1f) -> [4s,3p,2d,1f]
    for the 6 H atoms, the cc-pVDZ-DK basis set: (4s,1p) -> [2s,1p]

This is why I am expecting 492 MO coefficients

    69 s + 50 p(x3) + 30 d(x5) + 15 f(x7) + 2 g(x9) = 492

(2) MY VERY BAD!! I finally get it... I am missing that the output is actually simply broken!!! Indeed, looking again and calmly at the example file, I do
see that the output does not make sense! As you noticed: for each MO,
492 coefficients are given, but there is no information that may help connect them with the given primitive Gaussians... Sorry! I was only staring at the g
functions issue ..
I will look into the sources to try to fix how the basis functions are written.

Thanks a lot for your valuable help and for your time.

All the best,
Max




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with<2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2


_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to