[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm guessing that the "flatness" means that she doesn't modify colors enough > to make things seem more 3 dimensional. I don't see anything wrong with her > relying on colors for expression and content, though.
Me either. My initial comment was NOT a criticism of that, merely a description, and I said it ONLY to point out that considering the way she paints (and presumably sees) it's unlikely she'd be doing anything three-dimensional, such as sculpture, which is what Bob M (I think) was wondering about. In subtler ways, that's > what the color field painters did- people like Rothko. In bolder ways- > Pollock. Yes, exactly. Happy Thanksgiving everyone, or an extra happy Thursday if this week's Thursday is just another day for you. Debra Shea
