kakki wrote: > Lama, > > Where do you get your info that its been proven a failure over and over? You > can write me off-list if you want. As far as I know it was pretty much built > a long time ago. In fact, there have been successful tests of its technology > disseminated in the media. It's a pretty simple technology in the overall > scheme of today's knowledge. It hasn't been proven in an scenario of > preventing an actual incoming nuke, I suppose, but it has been shown to work > in other simulations. I still think it's a far better option that meeting a > incoming nuke with a return nuke.
But wouldn't exploding a nuke release radioactivity into the atmosphere for all to breathe and get cancer? Also, I am pretty sure the failed tests far outweigh the successful ones. I recall the last one being faked. RR
