either you consider an infant a person or you don't.
if you do not, then the infant is no more than property.
if you do, then individual rights must be afforded an infant and he or
she should not be subject to the whims of parental or cultural
affectations without prior consent. its obvious that parents should not
act as proxies for the will of the infant in matters of irreversible
physical alterations that are not life-threatening or grossly debilitating.
because I consider an infant to be a person and therefore not the
"property" of the parents, i consider any circumcision of an infant,
outside of medically necessary interventions, a direct violent assault
which should be illegal.
cul
- Re: njc: circumcision 2 cents cul heath